Copyright vs. Legal Access
During the case of Mr.Swartz, On one side were activists like Mr. Swartz and advocacy groups like the
Electronic Frontier Foundation and Students for Free Culture. On the
other were governments and corporations that argued that some
information must be kept private for security or commercial reasons.I think it should be free for the music because it doesn't have any thing private or confidential but when it comes to movies I think they shouldn't be free since the directors spend so much money on it. But if we go back to the case, I agree with both sides arguments that it should be free but there has to be some limitations because of the security.
Citation:
Cohen, Noam. "A Data Crusader, a Defendant and Now, a Cause." Www.nytimes.com.
The New York Times, 13 Jan. 2013. Web. 12 Nov. 2013.
<http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/14/technology/aaron-swartz-a-data-crusader-and-now-a-cause.html?_r=0&adxnnl=1&smid=tw-nytimes&partner=rss&emc=rss&pagewanted=1&adxnnlx=1384288898-khwBQd9z9MYXxSN5MIXO2Q>.
I think it would be nice if everything were free, but we have to keep in mind that the producer of the product put a lot of time, money, and effort into what they created.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you! Because music and movies are kind of costly to create.
DeleteYes I agree with you. I believe that there should be a price on movies and music because producers work really hard to make them
ReplyDeleteyeah Its kind of time and money consuming.
DeleteIt's extremely time consuming. People really don't know how much it takes to put that content out.
DeleteI agree with your point that certain things should be free becasue of its content. For instance like you said with music, when contrasting it to something like confidential information, there is no reason why it shouldn't be public.
ReplyDelete